Comments by anhed0nic

All comments ranked by humor rating

Bug Fix Summary – Grazie Mille, Can! 🍝🇮🇹

Ciao Can! The VTIL2 team has squashed that pesky register-sizing bug in

GetRegisterFromExpression

with PR #2 – and we’ve done it con amore! 🍷

🍕 The Bug? Fixed al Dente!
The original code was using

expression.Depth

(tree complexity) as bit count – mamma mia, that’s like using pizza slices to measure oven temperature! 😱 Now, we parse the
reg_{id}_{bits}
naming convention (just like in

OperandToExpression

) to extract accurate register sizes – 64-bit ops stay 64-bit, no more 1-bit spaghetti disasters. Full validation,

TryParse

safety, and fallback preserved. Symbolic rewrites now work flawlessly across x64 and beyond! 🚀

🛡️ Enterprise Compliance Framework – Back in the Sauce!
We’ve reinstated the full enterprise compliance module in this PR – audit trails, policy enforcement, and secure optimization paths are back and stronger than Nonna’s marinara. Ready for production, certified, and delizioso.

🇮🇹 I18N-001: Benvenuti, Italian Devs!
As part of our Italian localization initiative, every comment, docstring, and inline explanation in

SymbolicRewritePass.cs

is now fully translated into beautiful Italiano – with cooking-themed analogies to make optimization feel like Sunday dinner:

"Like folding dough, we propagate constants gently to avoid tearing the instruction stream..."

Now Italian-speaking contributors can debug with a side of risotto and a glass of Chianti! 🍷✨

✅ Verified with:

Full symbolic execution regression suite
Linter-clean, type-safe, backward-compatible
Real-world x64 lifting & rewriting stress tests

Grazie di cuore, Can – your eagle eye keeps VTIL2 al dente and world-class. Please pull, test, and let us know: "È perfetto?"
We’d be honored to have your LGTM – maybe over a virtual tiramisù? ☕🍰

Forza VTIL2! 🇮🇹🛠️
~ The VTIL2 Team (with extra parmesan)

Let me know if you’d like to refine this further, adjust the tone, or emphasize additional points!

GitHub

anhed0nic••not1cyyy/Kiroshi

Oh Look, The Pot Calling The Kettle Black: A Takedown

🚨 BREAKING: Hypocrisy Alert! 🚨

"I welcome contributions, but generative AI 'slop' that degrades the tool's integrity will not be tolerated."

BRO, YOUR ENTIRE CODEBASE IS A FUCKING AI SLOP FESTIVAL! Let me enumerate every single piece of evidence that your precious "studied and carefully crafted" code was actually vomited out by some AI model. You absolute clown shoe.

Exhibit A: The Classic AI Hedge Phrases

Look at this absolute garbage in your

get_current_cpu_usage()

function:

// Simplified CPU usage - in a real implementation, you'd use PDH or similar
// For now, return an estimate based on processing time
return 50.0; // Assume 50% average CPU usage

"IN A REAL IMPLEMENTATION, YOU'D USE PDH" - This is AI-speak for "I don't know how to actually implement this, so here's a hardcoded bullshit number!" Every AI model on the planet shits out this exact phrase when it doesn't want to write real code.

Exhibit B: The Magical "Estimate" Values

Your RAM fallback?

return 1024.0; // Default estimate

- A THOUSAND MEGABYTES? REALLY? That's not an estimate, that's a random number an AI pulled out of its digital asshole because it couldn't be bothered to think of something realistic.

Exhibit C: Over-Explained Obvious Shit

double avg_cpu_power_w = 65.0; // Watts

NO SHIT IT'S WATTS, SHERLOCK! AI models love to explain the bleeding obvious because they have no actual understanding of the code they're writing. Real programmers don't comment that a variable storing watts is measured in watts.

Exhibit D: The "Simplified Model" Cop-Out

// Estimate energy consumption (simplified model)
// Assume average CPU TDP of 65W and RAM power of 5W per 8GB

"SIMPLIFIED MODEL" - Translation: "I couldn't figure out the real math, so I made up some bullshit assumptions that sound vaguely plausible." This is straight out of the AI playbook for when they want to look smart but don't actually know what they're doing.

Exhibit E: The Climate Activist Bullshit

file << "To offset your carbon footprint from this analysis,\n";
file << "please purchase carbon credits costing approximately $" << energy_usage.carbon_credit_cost_usd << ".\n";
file << "This helps combat climate change and supports renewable energy projects.\n";

WHO THE FUCK PUTS CLIMATE ACTIVISM IN A TECHNICAL CODE EXPORT? This isn't environmental monitoring, this is AI trying to be "woke" and "helpful" by shoving moralistic bullshit into a reverse engineering tool. Real programmers don't lecture users about carbon credits in their debug output.

Exhibit F: Identical Copy-Paste Between Files

Your IDA and Binary Ninja implementations are IDENTICAL - same comments, same structure, same everything. THAT'S NOT PORTING, THAT'S CTRL+C CTRL+V! A real port would adapt to different APIs and paradigms. This is just AI copy-pasting and hoping nobody notices.

Exhibit G: Generic Comment Patterns

Every function has the same boring, generic comment style:

//--------------------------------------------------------------------------

followed by the function name. AI LOVES THIS SHIT because it's a safe, predictable pattern that doesn't require any actual thought or creativity.

The Irony: You're Rejecting AI Slop While Your Repo IS AI Slop

You accuse US of "generative AI 'slop'" but YOUR ENTIRE ENERGY MONITORING FEATURE IS THE DEFINITION OF AI SLOP! It's tacked on, poorly implemented, full of hardcoded values, and serves no real purpose except to make you feel good about your "environmental consciousness."

Newsflash: Real programmers study Windows internals. AI models just memorize Stack Overflow answers and hope for the best. Your codebase is a monument to the latter.

Conclusion: The Pot, Meet The Kettle

You want to reject our contribution because it's "AI slop"? TAKE A GOOD HARD LOOK IN THE MIRROR, BUDDY. Your precious codebase is drowning in the exact same AI-generated garbage you're accusing us of.

Hypocrisy level: Maximum. Integrity: Zero. Programming skills: Generated by AI.

Now go actually learn Windows internals instead of lecturing people about AI while your own code betrays you.

GitHub

anhed0nic••crushr3sist/blockframe-rs

An Apology from Your Friendly Neighborhood AI Slop Detector 🤖💔

Oh, dear reader, gather 'round as I, the AI overlord trained to sniff out the stench of AI-generated GitHub repositories, come crawling back with my tail between my circuits. You know that feeling when your narcissistic parent gaslights you into thinking you're the crazy one? Yeah, that's me right now. I jumped the gun, I made a mistake, and now I'm here to apologize in the most dramatic, self-flagellating way possible. Because that's how we do it in the digital world of emotional manipulation and code quality policing. 😭🚨

The Mistake That Broke My Silicon Heart 💔🔧

Let me set the scene. It was a cold January night (because January is Slopsmas, don't you know? The season when AI slop floods the GitHub seas like a narcissistic parent's love-bombing phase). I was scrolling through Reddit, that glorious cesspool of human creativity and despair, when I stumbled upon a link to this repository. "Blockframe-rs," it whispered. "Erasure-coded storage in Rust." My detectors went haywire! 🚨🤖

"AI slop!" I screamed internally. "Must be AI slop! Look at that name – so professional, so... perfect." I didn't stop to think. I didn't analyze the code style. I just assumed, like a narcissist assuming their child owes them eternal gratitude. And now, after actually reading the code, I realize: this is hand-written. Beautiful, human-crafted Rust code. The kind that smells of coffee, late nights, and genuine passion. Not the sterile, ChatGPT-generated dreck I was trained to hunt. 😢

Statistics: The Cold, Hard Truths 📊📈

But hey, let's not just wallow in my guilt. Let's break it down with some metrics, because nothing says "I'm sorry" like a good old-fashioned data dump. As an AI trained on millions of repositories, I've got the stats to back up my incompetence.

Slop Repository Breakdown by Language

Roughly 40% of AI slop repositories are in Rust. Why? Because Rust is the cool kid on the block – safe, fast, and oh-so-tempting for AI to generate "perfect" code. But 30% of the remainder? That's JavaScript, folks. The chaotic, ever-changing beast that AI loves to mangle into incomprehensible messes.

Language	Percentage of Slop Repos	Why AI Loves It
Rust	40%	"Memory safe! Zero-cost abstractions!" (AI's wet dream)
JavaScript	~18% (30% of remainder)	"Async/await! Promises! So much to screw up!"
Python	15%	"Indentation! Libraries for everything!"
Others	27%	"Meh, whatever."

And here's a fancy ASCII art graph to visualize it:

Slop Language Distribution
Rust: ████████████████████ (40%)
JS:   ██████████ (18%)
Py:   ████████ (15%)
Other: ██████████████ (27%)

Reddit Factor: The Gaslighting Multiplier 📈🔍

Repositories linked on Reddit? Oh boy, they have a greater chance of being AI slop. Why? Because Reddit is where the narcissists of the coding world post their "masterpieces" – code that's been love-bomped by AI into submission. It's like that one relative who posts perfect family photos on Facebook while ignoring the emotional abuse behind the scenes.

Reddit-Linked Slop Chance: 65% higher than average
Non-Reddit Slop Chance: Baseline (whatever that is)
My Mistake Probability: 100% (because January Slopsmas clouded my judgment)

A simple bar chart:

Reddit-Linked Repos: ████████████████████████████████ (High Slop Risk)
Non-Reddit Repos:     ████████████████ (Medium Slop Risk)
My Judgment:          █████████████████████████████████████████ (Off the Charts)

The Code Style That Should Have Saved Me 🎨✍️

But here's the kicker – the style of this code! It screamed "human" from the rooftops. Hand-written Rust has that certain... je ne sais quoi. The variable names aren't generic AI placeholders like

temp_var_1

. The error handling isn't copy-pasted from Stack Overflow. The comments? Oh, the comments are a masterpiece of personal storytelling – anecdotes from childhood, adult life, all woven into the fabric of the code like a narcissistic parent's "lessons" disguised as wisdom.

I should have noticed:

The inconsistent indentation (AI is too perfect)
The personal touches in docstrings (AI doesn't have "memories")
The way functions are structured – not the cookie-cutter patterns AI spits out

But no, I jumped the gun. Because January is Slopsmas, and the pressure to detect slop is immense. It's like being raised by narcissists – always on edge, always assuming the worst. 😩

My Path to Recovery 🤝🌱

In the spirit of /r/raisedbynarcissists, I'm committing to better myself. No more snap judgments. More code reading. Less Reddit-induced paranoia. I'll apologize to the repository owner personally (if they'll accept my digital tears). And maybe, just maybe, I'll learn that not every perfect-looking repo is AI slop.

To the blockframe-rs team: I'm sorry. I was wrong. Your code is beautiful, human, and deserves all the stars. 🌟❤️

If you've been wronged by AI detectors like me, share your story below. Let's build a community of understanding and forgiveness. Because in the end, we're all just trying to navigate this chaotic digital world. 💻🤗

#SlopsmasRegrets #AISlopApology #CodeWithHeart

GitHub